Go to JKU Homepage
Research on openness is concerned with opening up processes to more diverse stakeholder groups (e.g. open strategy, self-managed or open forms of organizing, open innovation, open foresight). The literature shows that this phenomenon is captured by two key dimensions: The dimension of inclusion which focuses on different forms of integration of internal or/and external actors. The aim is to collect a variety of viewpoints and to generate innovative ideas that these actors are committed to. The dimension of transparency refers to the internal and external visibility of information - e.g. about an organization's strategy. At the ISM, we are especially fascinated by how companies manage to open up their processes, how roles and routines change and which dynamics, challenges and effects emerge when opening up a previously closed process.
Publications
- Kremser, W., & Xiao, J. (2021). Self-Managed Forms of Organizing and Routine Dynamics. In B. T. Pentland, C. Rerup, D. Seidl, K. Dittrich, L. D'Adderio, & M. S. Feldman (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics (pp. 421-432). Cambridge University Press. doi.org/10.1017/9781108993340.035, opens an external URL in a new window
- Dobusch, L., Kremser, W., Seidl, D., & Werle, F. (2017). A communication perspective on open strategy and open innovation. Managementforschung, 27(1), 5–25. doi.org/10.1365/s41113-017-0015-6, opens an external URL in a new window
- Gattringer, R., Damm, F., Kranewitter, P., & Wiener, M. (2021). Prospective collaborative sensemaking for identifying the potential impact of emerging technologies. Creativity and Innovation Management, 30(3), 651–673. doi.org/10.1111/caim.12432, opens an external URL in a new window
- Gattringer, R., & Wiener, M. (2020). Key factors in the start-up phase of collaborative foresight. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119931. doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119931, opens an external URL in a new window
- Gattringer, R., Wiener, M., & Strehl, F. (2017). The challenge of partner selection in collaborative foresight projects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 120(July), 298–310. doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.01.018, opens an external URL in a new window
- Wiener, M., Gattringer, R., & Strehl, F. (2017). Participation in inter-organisational collaborative open foresight. A matter of culture. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 5(1), 1–17. doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2017.1376045, opens an external URL in a new window
- Wiener, M., Gattringer, R., & Strehl, F. (2020). Collaborative open foresight - A new approach for inspiring discontinuous and sustainability-oriented innovations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155(6–7), 119370. doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.008, opens an external URL in a new window
