Research on temporality is concerned with the perception as well as the organization of time on two different levels. The first level considers the passing of time. Important concepts that help describe this level are duration and sequence, as well as derivatives such as pace and rhythm. It is all about when people act. The second level is concerned with the time horizons of the past, present, and future. How actors construct and interrelate these time-horizons is considered to be of critical importance for understanding how and why they act. At the ISM, we are especially fascinated by how temporality affects and is affected by organizational routines and strategizing practices.

• Kremser, W., & Blagoev, B. (2021). The Dynamics of Prioritizing: How actors temporally pattern complex role-routine ecologies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(2), 339-379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839220948483, opens an external URL in a new window

• Geiger, D., Danner-Schröder, A., & Kremser, W. (2021). Getting Ahead of Time – Performing Temporal Boundaries to Coordinate Routines Under Temporal Uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(1), 220-264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839220941010, opens an external URL in a new window

• Gattringer, R., Damm, F., Kranewitter, P., & Wiener, M. (2021). Prospective collaborative sensemaking for identifying the potential impact of emerging technologies. Creativity and Innovation Management, 30(3), 651–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12432, opens an external URL in a new window